Aaron Hodson
Feb. 19th, 2008
Theology of the Reformers, by Timothy George. Broadman Press,
In the first chapter of his assessment George offers a most helpful analytical overview of the various changes happening all across the western world within the church and culture before the reformation. Among these changes was a certain sense of anxiety and weightiness over being right with God and clean from the many sins that separate us from Him. These concerns among laymen and religious leader alike are demonstrated in the emphasis on and adherence to confessions of various kinds, which in turn contributed to a focus on themes of death and guilt; which George concludes all points a “crisis of meaning” within a search for truth in late medieval society.[3] In the mist of this environment of searching and questioning the abuses and hypocrisy of the visible and traditional church became a huge issue. This gave raise to changes in the previous conception of the identity of the true Church.[4] Papal authority began to be questioned, various theological and biblical formulations were being re-examined, and humanistic (in the classical sense) educational ideals began to be valued above traditional scholastic understandings. These changes all pointed to the same conclusion. Something was coming, and as hunger pains before the commencement of the feast, the church yearned for renewal out of a deep sense of dissolution and incompleteness.
With two extensive and thorough chapters devoted the journey’s and resulting theologies of Luther and Calvin, George while not ignoring the social and political influences on these men nor the cultural contexts which they interacted with, focuses primarily on the development and far-reaching implications of their theological discoveries. By illuminating their theological self-understanding in this way George fairly well succeeds in showing the influential legacy’s that these men left behind. Georges approach does not emphasize the saintliness of life—in Luther’s case—nor the complexity of character—referring to Calvin—of these great men, but instead focuses on the keen insight of these men into character of man and most importantly into the gracious character of God in Christ Jesus.[5]
Likewise George’s chapter on Zwingli dispels the myths and unknowns and focuses on the man and his theological contributions. Devoting a much larger section of consideration on his contributions on the Reformation George shows how in the mist of a humanistic orientation like Calvin and Luther, Zwingli—while differing on many points and more radical in some issue—held to the authority of the Scripture as his foundation for various theological formulations. The most significant insight into the life and thought of Zwingli—making him fall among the influential reformationist—that Georges analysis provides is in showing his deep commitment Christocentric theology, and Divine providence and predestination.[6] Lastly, one of the most significant contributions of Georges work on the whole could be seen to be his evaluation of the Menno Simons of the Anabaptist who he sees as a fairly reliable voice among and the more radical religious reform movements of the century following the beginnings of the Reformation.[7] George gives a fair evaluation of the Anabaptist and other unique radical movements emphasizing on the similarities to other reformation theologians maintained and developed upon even by these minority reform movements, as the unique contributions they offered to this new configuration of the meaning of the Church; some of these contributions includes issue like tolerance and the logical implications of giving the individual the right to interpret the scriptures.
In his final chapter George attempts to pull together his focused evaluation of these four representative reformers to argue for a unified theology of the reformers that holds an “Abiding Validity” for and influence upon the evangelical protestant Christianity of current times.[8] The only criticism that could be offered is that perhaps George’s evaluation while respectable in its attempt to understand this primary religious movement in light mainly theological considerations is limited in its scope. In other words while it could be argued that the reformation is only rightly understood by considering the strong spiritual and theological factors influencing it, resent scholarship[9] would seem to suggest that the political, economic, and social factors can be understood as merely minor factors of these religious event, but must be evaluated seriously along side various solely religious interpretations. Even so, evaluating this work on its own terms at the time it was written it remains an unique and insightful resource in and of itself as well as for the deeper understanding it displays in relation to the progression of reformation scholarship such as it has developed over the last twenty years. In conclusion Timothy George’s Theology of the Reformers offers a valuable perspective and contribution that should be referenced and considered by any student or teacher of reformation history.
[1] Timothy George, Theology of the Reformers (Broadman 1988) pp. 18
[2] Ibid pp. 19
[3] Ibid pp. 28
[4] Ibid pp. 30
[5] Benjamin W. Farley. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society “Theology of the Reformers by Timothy George.”.
[6] Ibid (B.W. Farley)
[7] Ibid (B.W. Farley)
[8] Timothy George, Theology of the Reformers (Broadman 1988) pp. 308
[9] A reference to, Alister McGrath Christianity’s Dangerous Idea (HarperOne 2006)

2 comments:
Aaron: "this work presents an argument somewhat original for its day and with reference to more recent scholarship its thesis remains unique within certain aspects of its approach and perspective."
I am not very familiar with the common interpretations of the Reformation. Exactly what are the perspectives that "Theology of the Reformers" is unique to?
The context in which I wrote this review was in evaluation of a book that presents a new thesis for it's time (from a historical standpoint that is). As far as most historical accounts go previous to this book the Reformation was presented by many historians as motivated and generated primarily by political and economical causes rather than because of religious turmoil and the need to bring the church back to the Scriptures. Timothy Georges Thesis seems to be that the Reformation while certainly effected and influenced by other external historic factors--such as political and economic pressures as a result of the mixing of Church and state and the hierarchy this created between rich and poor...--the reformers themselves (e.g. Luther, Calvin, Zwingli) where for the most motivated by a true desire to bring the Church back to the gospel and back to the people. While perspectives of this book are fairly common among Christians today at the time George wrote it was an uncommonly critical and insightful evaluation of the this great historical movement--just as many other books began to be written at this time that started to apply pricipals of Source Criticism (which looked at historical events from all their angles and for all their complexities for the first time) instead of interpreting history as mere black and white events if you will.
Does that answer your question a little?
Post a Comment